Public Sex: The Culture of Radical Sex by Pat Califia

Author:Pat Califia [PAT CALIFIA]
Language: eng
Format: epub
Published: 2016-06-06T16:00:00+00:00

NOTES

1. Leidholdt, Dorchen. “Lesbian S/M: Sexual Radicalism or Reaction.” New Women’s Times, July/August 1982, 17.

2. Herlihy, Sean. “Porn Debate Continues: Dorchen vs. Civil Liberties Union.” Gay Community News, May 24, 1985, 6, 10. During this debate with Natasha Lisman, president of the Massahusetts Civil Liberties Union, Leidholdt also argued that the sex education manual, Show Me!, is child pornography, and that feminist artist Judy Chicago’s show, The Dinner Party, might qualify as porn under the proposed law.

3. Dworkin, Andrea and Catharine MacKinnon. “Model Civil Rights Anti-Pornography Law.” WAP Newsreport, Vol. vii, No. 1, 4-5. (All subsequent quotations from the legislation taken from this document.) This model law differs slightly from versions proposed in various cities. For example the Indianapolis bill deletes the phrase, “women are presented as whores by nature.”

4. Brief for Amici Curiae American Library Association, Indiana Library Association, and Indiana Library Trustee Association, ABA et al v. William B. Hudnut III et al, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 9.

5. Dworkin, Andrea. from her testimony before the City of Minneapolis Zoning Commission, October 18, 1983, 1. “I think you should say that what this statute does is to permit pornography…you are allowing hate literature directed at women…you are allowing the celebration of rape, the promotion of rape, the advocacy of rape…you are going to permit the exploitation of live women, the sadomasochistic use of live women, the binding and torture of real women and then have the depictions…sold in this city.”

6. “Agreement for Services as Consultants to the Minneapolis City Council,” January 18, 1983.

7. Rubenstein, David. “Pornography Law Splits Minneapolis.” In These Times, January 18-24, 1984, 5-6.

8. Page, Sharon. “Radical Feminists v. Civil Libertarians: Minneapolis Mayor Vetoes Anti-Porn Law.” Gay Community News, January 14, 1984, 1, 6.

9. op cit., 1.

10. “Anti-Porn Ordinance Vetoed Again.” Gay Community News, July 28, 1984, 2.

11. “Mayor Vetoes One Out of Three Anti-Porn Laws.” New York Native, August 13-26, 1984, 7-8.

12. Page, Sharon. “Limitations of a Mistaken Strategy: City Council Scuttles Anti-Porn Amendment.” Gay Community News, February 4, 1984, 3.

13. “Take Back the What?” Gay Community News, September 8, 1984, 3.

14. Duggan, Lisa. “Censorship in the Name of Feminism.” Village Voice, October 16, 1984, 14-17, 42.

15. Kearney, Robert P. “Porn and Civil Rights: II.” Playboy, July 1985, 56.

16. Eckhaus, Phyllis. “Censorship or Civil Rights? Feminists Split Over Indy Porn Law.” New York Womanews, January 1984, 7.

17. Raleigh, North Carolina News and Observer, January 28, 1985.

18. “Minneapolis-Style Bill: Anti-Porn Fever Strikes Long Island.” Gay Community News, October 13, 1984, 1.

19. “Civil Rights, or Morality Crusade?” Undated press release of the Feminist Anti-Censorship Task Force.

20. “Porn Panic Panned: Anti-Porn Bill Dies; Indianapolis Law Cited.” Gay Community News, January 19, 1985, 1-2.

21. “News Notes.” Gay Community News, November 24, 1984, 2.

22. Halfhill, Robert. “Minneapolis Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Threatening Minneapolis Gay Rights Ordinance.” New York Native, January 14-27, 1985, 12.

23. Jackson, James. “Fascist Surveillance: Indianapolis Gay Protests Bring Concessions.” Gay Community News, September 15, 1984, 1, 7.

24. Freiberg, Peter. “Gays and Police: Old Problems, New Hope.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.